![]() ![]() However, in keeping with the image of baby-faced naivete and weakness, defendants of that type were more likely to be found guilty when charged with negligent behavior. In a long study of courtroom trials, Zebrowitz found that the more baby-faced the defendant looked, the more likely he was to be acquitted of crimes involving intentional misconduct. Mature-faced men, by contrast, are perceived as being stronger, shrewder and more dominant. “Baby-faced (people) are seen as more naive, more submissive, warmer, more honest and physically weaker than their age mates,” she says. Zebrowitz, for example, has used the same “baby face-mature face” distinction in research on social attitudes. The idea that faces fall into types and that those types can in turn inspire strong emotions is not a new one in behavioral psychology. But I’m not so convinced that we know yet what they are.” There may be some universal (principles) of attractiveness. “This is an interesting theory with an interesting underlying hypothesis,” said Brandeis University psychologist Leslie Zebrowitz, who works in the same field. They can predict, down to the hundredth of a millimeter, what the most attractive eye size is, what turns a chin from a liability into an asset and how big a nose a man can carry before women start to look away.Īre we close to knowing what the perfect male face looks like? Moreover, the psychologists maintain that their experimental results allow them to quantify the components of male attractiveness. The researchers claim that these standards of attractiveness cut across social, racial and cultural lines, that while women around the world have different tastes in male weight, body type and grooming, everywhere they like the same thing in a man’s face. The implications of the theory are enormous. ![]() This is about faces that trigger that first quickening of the pulse, that first hint of longing, that weakening of the knees. This is about impressions formed by photographs, by chance encounters, by staring deep into a man’s eyes. Nor is it about body shape, which obviously plays its own significant role. Why one woman or man becomes truly committed to another results from a host of factors of which facial attractiveness is only one. This theory is not about true love, of course. Simpson and Tom Selleck also qualify as perfect scores, according to the researchers. ![]() They like Mel Gibson (a god) over Al Pacino (nose much, much too big). They like Robert Redford (big eyes and strong jaw) over Michael Jackson (no chin). They want men they can cuddle like McCartney and cling to like Eastwood. "The Phi ratio of 1.618 has long been thought to hold the secret for beauty, but now with the computer mapping we can calculate how it applies to real women.Women prefer men, in other words, whose faces inspire both their inclination to nurture and their desire for a sexually mature partner. Across the 12 key markers for nose, lips, eyes, forehead, chin and facial symmetry and shape Amber Heard had the highest combined score. Amber Heard had a near perfect ratio of nose dimension 99.7 per cent and her chin was also almost perfect. "The results were startling and showed several famous actresses and models have facial features that come close to the ancient Greek principles for physical perfection. "After we had created the software and the algorithms for the key marker points on the face I thought it would be a good idea to test the system on some of the most beautiful women in the world and see if we could prove with geometry and science exactly what it is that makes a beautiful face. "With this ground-breaking technology, we have solved some of the mysteries of what it is that makes someone physically beautiful. "We have devised a brand new computer mapping technique which can calculate how to make subtle improvements to facial shapes,” De Silva said of his research. Kim Kardashian says Taylor Swift helped 'REWRITE' Kanye West's track Famous in new KUWTK teaser ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |